
Core i9-9900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900KS
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,397 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌21% higher power demand at 127W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 127W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-9900KS
2019Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 37.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 127W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,397 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌21% higher power demand at 127W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core i9-9900KS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 485 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-9900KS
Core i9-9900KS
The Core i9-9900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 127 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,397 points. Launch price was $513.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-9900KS and Ryzen 7 5800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900KS versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900KS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-9900KS uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900KS scores 19,397 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 35.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900KS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+5% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,397 | 27,712+43% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900KS uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9900KS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900KS launched at $513 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($513 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900KS delivers 37.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 48% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900KS | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $513 | $449-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.8 | 61.7+63% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












