
Core i9-7940X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7940X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,452 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-7940X
2017Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $950 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,452 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core i9-7940X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 446 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 391 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 636 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 636 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 418 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7940X and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-7940X
Core i9-7940X
The Core i9-7940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,452 points. Launch price was $1,399.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7940X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7940X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-7940X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7940X scores 25,452 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 8.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-7940X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 25,452 | 27,712+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7940X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7940X launched at $1399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($1399 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $950 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7940X delivers 18.2 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 108.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1399 | $449-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.2 | 61.7+239% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











