PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 44.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
16.7% HIGHER MSRP
$524 MSRPvs$449 MSRP

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 46,825).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i9-14900F

2024

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 44.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
16.7% HIGHER MSRP
$524 MSRPvs$449 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 46,825).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900F better than Ryzen 7 5800X?

Yes. Core i9-14900F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 69% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900F is the better fit. You are getting 69% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900F is the smarter buy today. Core i9-14900F is 16.7% more expensive on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 44.8% better value on MSRP (89.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 5800X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-14900F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5800X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	318 FPS	206 FPS
medium	309 FPS	178 FPS
high	244 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	206 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	276 FPS	170 FPS
medium	238 FPS	142 FPS
high	176 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	83 FPS
medium	162 FPS	74 FPS
high	121 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	497 FPS	662 FPS
medium	436 FPS	558 FPS
high	355 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	314 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	422 FPS	563 FPS
medium	381 FPS	493 FPS
high	317 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	361 FPS
4K
low	236 FPS	350 FPS
medium	217 FPS	308 FPS
high	206 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	250 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	760 FPS	693 FPS
medium	624 FPS	651 FPS
high	541 FPS	570 FPS
ultra	465 FPS	464 FPS
1440p
low	680 FPS	693 FPS
medium	567 FPS	573 FPS
high	485 FPS	498 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	413 FPS
4K
low	500 FPS	484 FPS
medium	439 FPS	410 FPS
high	391 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	302 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
1080p
low	990 FPS	693 FPS
medium	886 FPS	693 FPS
high	774 FPS	693 FPS
ultra	688 FPS	693 FPS
1440p
low	821 FPS	693 FPS
medium	723 FPS	693 FPS
high	631 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	593 FPS
4K
low	606 FPS	604 FPS
medium	543 FPS	550 FPS
high	480 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	436 FPS

Open Core i9-14900F Open Ryzen 7 5800X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900F and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-14900F

The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.

Ryzen 7 5800X

The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-14900F has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 17.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-14900F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900F scores 46,825 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 51.3% lead for the Core i9-14900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+19%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.8 GHz+90%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+13%	32 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	46,825+69%	27,712
Cinebench R23 Multi	33,820	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Core i9-14900F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-14900F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i9-14900F	Ryzen 7 5800X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-14900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($524 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900F delivers 89.4 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Core i9-14900F the 36.6% better value option.