
Core i9-13900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+54.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 42,735).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900T
2023Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+54.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.3% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 42,735).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900T better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1002 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 897 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 785 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 698 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 640 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900T and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-13900T
Core i9-13900T
The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900T scores 42,735 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 42.7% lead for the Core i9-13900T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+13% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+245% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 42,735+54% | 27,712 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Core i9-13900T supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+139900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-13900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The Core i9-13900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($549 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900T delivers 77.8 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Core i9-13900T the 23.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900T | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $449-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.8+26% | 61.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












