
Core i9-13900H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i9-13900H
2023Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $168 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900H better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 686 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+15% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+46% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 27,444 | 27,712 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900H launched at $617 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($617 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $168 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900H delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 32.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $617 | $449-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.5 | 61.7+39% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












