
Core i9-10940X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,684 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.3 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-10940X
2019Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $335 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,684 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.3 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core i9-10940X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 639 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10940X and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i9-10940X
Core i9-10940X
The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10940X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+2% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 27,684 | 27,712 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i9-10940X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10940X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10940X) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Core i9-10940X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10940X) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+100% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-10940X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10940X launched at $784 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($784 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $335 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10940X delivers 35.3 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 54.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $784 | $449-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3 | 61.7+75% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












