
Core i5-11600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11600K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,520 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 74.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11600K
2021Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,520 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 74.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core i5-11600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11600K and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core i5-11600K
Core i5-11600K
The Core i5-11600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,520 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-11600K uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600K scores 19,520 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 34.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,520 | 27,712+42% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 500 series,Intel 400 series (Core i5-11600K) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i5-11600K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The Core i5-11600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-11600K launched at $262 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. On MSRP ($262 vs $449), the Core i5-11600K is $187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600K delivers 74.5 pts/$ vs 61.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Core i5-11600K the 18.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-42% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.5+21% | 61.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











