
Core 7 160UL
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 160UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 7 160UL
2024Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Core 7 160UL?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 573 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 436 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Ryzen 7 5800X

Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 86% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+11% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz+111% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 11,043 | 27,712+151% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 160UL) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












