Core i5-11600KF vs Ryzen 7 5800HS

Intel

Core i5-11600KF

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-11600KF

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 19,512).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $237 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 5800HS

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5800HS better than Core i5-11600KF?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-11600KF is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800HS pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 5800HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5800HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-11600KF makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 5800HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $237 MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-11600KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-11600KF is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (82.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5800HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
1080p
low301 FPS183 FPS
medium263 FPS150 FPS
high221 FPS121 FPS
ultra189 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low247 FPS155 FPS
medium195 FPS125 FPS
high159 FPS101 FPS
ultra140 FPS82 FPS
4K
low170 FPS87 FPS
medium136 FPS76 FPS
high105 FPS60 FPS
ultra92 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
1080p
low476 FPS488 FPS
medium380 FPS421 FPS
high338 FPS361 FPS
ultra295 FPS315 FPS
1440p
low409 FPS452 FPS
medium332 FPS381 FPS
high301 FPS331 FPS
ultra262 FPS279 FPS
4K
low339 FPS323 FPS
medium279 FPS280 FPS
high254 FPS256 FPS
ultra214 FPS221 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
1080p
low487 FPS488 FPS
medium487 FPS488 FPS
high487 FPS488 FPS
ultra487 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low487 FPS488 FPS
medium487 FPS488 FPS
high487 FPS486 FPS
ultra451 FPS430 FPS
4K
low487 FPS469 FPS
medium456 FPS397 FPS
high390 FPS349 FPS
ultra318 FPS284 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
1080p
low487 FPS488 FPS
medium487 FPS488 FPS
high487 FPS488 FPS
ultra487 FPS488 FPS
1440p
low487 FPS488 FPS
medium487 FPS488 FPS
high487 FPS488 FPS
ultra487 FPS440 FPS
4K
low487 FPS473 FPS
medium487 FPS422 FPS
high487 FPS370 FPS
ultra437 FPS315 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11600KF and Ryzen 7 5800HS

Intel

Core i5-11600KF

The Core i5-11600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11600KF packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600KF versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600KF (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-11600KF uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600KF scores 19,468 against the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 19,512 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600KF vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS.

FeatureCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+11%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+39%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Rocket Lake (2021)
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
19,468
19,512
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,277
Geekbench 6 Single
2,138
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,631
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11600KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11600KF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS). Primary use case: Core i5-11600KF targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11600KF rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.

FeatureCore i5-11600KFRyzen 7 5800HS
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming