M4 (8 cores) vs Ryzen 7 5800H

M4 (8 cores)

8 Cores8 Thrd4 WWMax: 4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5800H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

M4 (8 cores)

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…+0.4% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 4W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800H across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 5800H

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (20,686 vs 20,761).
  • ❌1025% higher power demand at 45W vs 4W.
  • ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while M4 (8 cores) moves to none and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is M4 (8 cores) better than Ryzen 7 5800H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 5800H is ahead with a 22.4% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M4 (8 cores) pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 (8 cores) is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M4 (8 cores) still looks like the safer overall buy. M4 (8 cores) is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 (8 cores) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of FP6, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
1080p
low177 FPS183 FPS
medium141 FPS150 FPS
high115 FPS121 FPS
ultra91 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS155 FPS
medium113 FPS125 FPS
high91 FPS101 FPS
ultra72 FPS82 FPS
4K
low67 FPS87 FPS
medium56 FPS76 FPS
high44 FPS60 FPS
ultra35 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
1080p
low350 FPS517 FPS
medium297 FPS422 FPS
high253 FPS361 FPS
ultra205 FPS316 FPS
1440p
low301 FPS459 FPS
medium265 FPS383 FPS
high229 FPS333 FPS
ultra185 FPS281 FPS
4K
low213 FPS328 FPS
medium193 FPS281 FPS
high172 FPS257 FPS
ultra139 FPS222 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
1080p
low519 FPS517 FPS
medium519 FPS517 FPS
high519 FPS517 FPS
ultra496 FPS517 FPS
1440p
low519 FPS517 FPS
medium495 FPS517 FPS
high446 FPS486 FPS
ultra386 FPS430 FPS
4K
low438 FPS469 FPS
medium347 FPS398 FPS
high301 FPS349 FPS
ultra240 FPS284 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
1080p
low519 FPS517 FPS
medium519 FPS517 FPS
high519 FPS517 FPS
ultra519 FPS517 FPS
1440p
low519 FPS517 FPS
medium519 FPS517 FPS
high519 FPS517 FPS
ultra459 FPS458 FPS
4K
low480 FPS495 FPS
medium429 FPS445 FPS
high384 FPS385 FPS
ultra333 FPS329 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 (8 cores) and Ryzen 7 5800H

M4 (8 cores)

The M4 (8 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 28 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 20,761 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800H

The Ryzen 7 5800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The M4 (8 cores) packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5800H's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the M4 (8 cores) versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800H β€” a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800H (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800H is built on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (8 cores) scores 20,761 against the Ryzen 7 5800H's 20,686 β€” a 0.4% lead for the M4 (8 cores).

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.89 GHz
3.2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
β€”
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
β€”
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
β€”
Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
20,761
20,686
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 (8 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM4 (8 cores)Ryzen 7 5800H
Socket
none
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0