
Core i9-13900TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 5800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 20,686).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $554 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 5800H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900TE
2023Ryzen 7 5800H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 5800H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 20,686).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $554 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Ryzen 7 5800H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 222 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900TE and Ryzen 7 5800H

Core i9-13900TE
Core i9-13900TE
The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800H
Ryzen 7 5800H
The Ryzen 7 5800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900TE packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800H — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900TE (base: 1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800H uses Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900TE scores 20,602 against the Ryzen 7 5800H's 20,686 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800H. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800H.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+14% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+220% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+125% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,602 | 20,686 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800H). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 5800H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Ryzen 7 5800H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











