
EPYC 7551
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7551
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,844).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7551
2017Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,844).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800 better than EPYC 7551?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 7 5800

EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7551 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7551 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551 scores 25,844 against the Ryzen 7 5800's 25,735 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7551. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800.
| Feature | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,844 | 25,735 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7551 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7551) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | OEM Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












