
Core i9-10920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,875).
Core i9-10920X
2019Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 96.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 25,875).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800 better than Core i9-10920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 647 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 587 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10920X and Ryzen 7 5800

Core i9-10920X
Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10920X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-10920X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10920X scores 25,875 against the Ryzen 7 5800's 25,735 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+3% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,875 | 25,735 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,458 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Core i9-10920X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-10920X) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-10920X) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800) — the Core i9-10920X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+83% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-10920X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800). Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation, Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | HEDT/Workstation | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10920X launched at $689 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800 debuted at $349. On MSRP ($689 vs $349), the Ryzen 7 5800 is $340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10920X delivers 37.6 pts/$ vs 73.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800 — making the Ryzen 7 5800 the 65% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $689 | $349-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6 | 73.7+96% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












