Core 7 250H vs Ryzen 7 5800

Intel

Core 7 250H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5800

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 7 250H

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (25,530 vs 25,735).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 5800

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Core 7 250H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 250H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 250H better than Ryzen 7 5800?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 7 250H is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 5800 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 250H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5800 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 7 250H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $349 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 5800 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 5800 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 250H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
1080p
low293 FPS166 FPS
medium270 FPS136 FPS
high226 FPS119 FPS
ultra192 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low239 FPS145 FPS
medium196 FPS116 FPS
high159 FPS98 FPS
ultra139 FPS79 FPS
4K
low166 FPS80 FPS
medium136 FPS69 FPS
high105 FPS55 FPS
ultra91 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
1080p
low638 FPS643 FPS
medium569 FPS541 FPS
high467 FPS441 FPS
ultra418 FPS397 FPS
1440p
low614 FPS551 FPS
medium516 FPS477 FPS
high425 FPS401 FPS
ultra359 FPS345 FPS
4K
low362 FPS342 FPS
medium311 FPS299 FPS
high287 FPS273 FPS
ultra249 FPS241 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
1080p
low638 FPS643 FPS
medium638 FPS547 FPS
high638 FPS497 FPS
ultra601 FPS425 FPS
1440p
low638 FPS558 FPS
medium638 FPS460 FPS
high578 FPS419 FPS
ultra496 FPS358 FPS
4K
low587 FPS405 FPS
medium489 FPS325 FPS
high442 FPS294 FPS
ultra375 FPS231 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
1080p
low638 FPS643 FPS
medium638 FPS643 FPS
high638 FPS643 FPS
ultra638 FPS643 FPS
1440p
low638 FPS643 FPS
medium638 FPS643 FPS
high638 FPS622 FPS
ultra620 FPS536 FPS
4K
low627 FPS556 FPS
medium557 FPS502 FPS
high503 FPS447 FPS
ultra435 FPS391 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 250H and Ryzen 7 5800

Intel

Core 7 250H

The Core 7 250H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,530 points. Launch price was $502.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800

The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core 7 250H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 250H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 250H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 — a 16% clock advantage for the Core 7 250H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 250H scores 25,530 against the Ryzen 7 5800's 25,735 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 250H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800.

FeatureCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+17%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
32 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
25,530
25,735
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 250H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
Socket
FCBGA1744
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 250H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.

FeatureCore 7 250HRyzen 7 5800
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
OEM Gaming