
Core 7 250H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 250H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,530 vs 25,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Core 7 250H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 250H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 7 250H
2024Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,530 vs 25,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Core 7 250H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 250H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 250H better than Ryzen 7 5800?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 614 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 638 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 638 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 620 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 627 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 250H and Ryzen 7 5800

Core 7 250H
Core 7 250H
The Core 7 250H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,530 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 7 250H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 250H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 250H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 — a 16% clock advantage for the Core 7 250H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 250H scores 25,530 against the Ryzen 7 5800's 25,735 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 250H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800.
| Feature | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+17% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,530 | 25,735 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 250H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 250H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Core 7 250H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | OEM Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












