
EPYC 7451
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7451
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,639).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7451, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7451
2017Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 26,639).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7451, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than EPYC 7451?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 666 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 5700X

EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7451. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 26,639 | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7451) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | EPYC 7451 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












