
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-13800H
2023Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 245 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 665 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 607 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Ryzen 7 5700X

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 26,349 | 26,609 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13800H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












