
Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 4700GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 4700GE
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,851).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Ryzen 7 4700GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 17 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,851).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Ryzen 7 4700GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 7 4700GE


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 4700GE
Ryzen 7 4700GE
The Ryzen 7 4700GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,636 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 4700GE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700GE — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 19,636 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700GE.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,851+1% | 19,636 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 7 4700GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











