PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 268V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 4700GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,698).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 268V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.

Core Ultra 7 268V

2024

Ryzen 7 4700GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 43.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.8 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 268V across 18 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,698).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 268V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Ryzen 7 4700GE?

Yes. Core Ultra 7 268V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 16.6% average FPS lead across 18 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 268V is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 16.6% more average FPS across 18 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 268V is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 268V is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 4700GE makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 7 268V is 50.5% more expensive on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.6% average FPS lead across 18 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 4700GE is also 50.0% better value on MSRP (65.7 vs 43.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 268V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 7 268V Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 4700GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	272 FPS	174 FPS
medium	243 FPS	141 FPS
high	205 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	230 FPS	149 FPS
medium	185 FPS	119 FPS
high	152 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	161 FPS	79 FPS
medium	130 FPS	69 FPS
high	101 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	42 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 268V Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	236 FPS	336 FPS
medium	195 FPS	288 FPS
high	176 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	210 FPS	291 FPS
medium	181 FPS	258 FPS
high	164 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	200 FPS
4K
low	155 FPS	236 FPS
medium	138 FPS	217 FPS
high	132 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	173 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 268V Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	492 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	491 FPS
high	492 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	491 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	491 FPS
high	492 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	468 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	492 FPS	433 FPS
medium	462 FPS	366 FPS
high	404 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	262 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 268V Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	492 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	491 FPS
high	492 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	491 FPS
1440p
low	492 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	491 FPS
high	492 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	492 FPS	491 FPS
medium	492 FPS	444 FPS
high	480 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	418 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core Ultra 7 268V Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 268V and Ryzen 7 4700GE

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 4700GE

The Ryzen 7 4700GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,636 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700GE — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 19,636 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+16%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+400%	512 kB (per core)
Process	3 nm-57%	7 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	19,698	19,636
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,653	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,437	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Socket	FCBGA2833	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8533	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700GE). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 268V	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Arc Graphics 140V	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Productivity	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 7 268V launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE debuted at $299. On MSRP ($450 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 4700GE is $151 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 268V delivers 43.8 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 4700GE — making the Ryzen 7 4700GE the 40% better value option.