PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-10900F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 4700GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-10900F.

Core i9-10900F

2020

Ryzen 7 4700GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +46.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Why buy it

✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 65.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $464 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.7 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($464 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,636 vs 19,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-10900F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900F better than Ryzen 7 4700GE?

Yes. Core i9-10900F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 46.0% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10900F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.0% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900F is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10900F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 4700GE makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-10900F is 55.2% more expensive on MSRP at $464 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.0% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 4700GE is also 53.9% better value on MSRP (65.7 vs 42.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 4700GE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10900F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-10900F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 4700GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	292 FPS	174 FPS
medium	259 FPS	141 FPS
high	219 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	239 FPS	149 FPS
medium	191 FPS	119 FPS
high	157 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	166 FPS	79 FPS
medium	135 FPS	69 FPS
high	104 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	42 FPS

Open Core i9-10900F Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	495 FPS	336 FPS
medium	495 FPS	288 FPS
high	495 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	495 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	495 FPS	291 FPS
medium	495 FPS	258 FPS
high	495 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	452 FPS	200 FPS
4K
low	458 FPS	236 FPS
medium	385 FPS	217 FPS
high	360 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	173 FPS

Open Core i9-10900F Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	495 FPS	491 FPS
medium	495 FPS	491 FPS
high	495 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	495 FPS	491 FPS
1440p
low	495 FPS	491 FPS
medium	495 FPS	491 FPS
high	495 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	461 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	495 FPS	433 FPS
medium	465 FPS	366 FPS
high	417 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	262 FPS

Open Core i9-10900F Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
1080p
low	495 FPS	491 FPS
medium	495 FPS	491 FPS
high	495 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	495 FPS	491 FPS
1440p
low	495 FPS	491 FPS
medium	495 FPS	491 FPS
high	495 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	495 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	495 FPS	491 FPS
medium	495 FPS	444 FPS
high	495 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	329 FPS

Open Core i9-10900F Open Ryzen 7 4700GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900F and Ryzen 7 4700GE

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 4700GE

The Ryzen 7 4700GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,636 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900F packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700GE — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-10900F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900F scores 19,800 against the Ryzen 7 4700GE's 19,636 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10900F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 4700GE.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+150%	8 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark	19,800	19,636
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,701	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,456	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700GE). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

Feature	Core i9-10900F	Ryzen 7 4700GE
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-10900F launched at $464 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 4700GE debuted at $299. On MSRP ($464 vs $299), the Ryzen 7 4700GE is $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900F delivers 42.7 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 4700GE — making the Ryzen 7 4700GE the 42.5% better value option.