
EPYC 7F32
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3800XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7F32
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 7F32
2020Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 430.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,441).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than EPYC 7F32?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 207 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 564 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 3800XT

EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 7 3800XT share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3800XT (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3800XT. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,253 | 23,441 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7F32) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F32 launched at $2100 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT debuted at $399. On MSRP ($2100 vs $399), the Ryzen 7 3800XT is $1701 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F32 delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Ryzen 7 3800XT the 136.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2100 | $399-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 58.7+429% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












