
Core i5-1035G7
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1035G7
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3750H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 8,008).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1035G7
2019Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3750H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 8,008).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1035G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1035G7 better than Ryzen 7 3750H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1035G7 and Ryzen 7 3750H

Core i5-1035G7
Core i5-1035G7
The Core i5-1035G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,008 points. Launch price was $309.


Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-1035G7 and Ryzen 7 3750H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G7 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3750H (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-1035G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses Picasso (Zen+) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G7 scores 8,008 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-1035G7. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1035G7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+92% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | Picasso (Zen+) (2019) |
| PassMark | 8,008 | 7,990 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,515 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1035G7 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1526 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1035G7) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i5-1035G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G7 targets Premium Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G7 rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | Core i5-1035G7 | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












