Core i5-10200H
Popular choices:
Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10200H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10200H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 7,997).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10200H
2020Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10200H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 7,997).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10200H better than Ryzen 7 3750H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 68 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10200H and Ryzen 7 3750H
Core i5-10200H
Core i5-10200H
The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.
Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10200H and Ryzen 7 3750H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses Picasso (Zen+) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-10200H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+2% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Picasso (Zen+) (2019) |
| PassMark | 7,997 | 7,990 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,372 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,392 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10200H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-10200H | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-10200H and Ryzen 7 3750H
