
Core i3-10300T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3750H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10300T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,879 vs 7,990).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.
Core i3-10300T
2020Ryzen 7 3750H
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,879 vs 7,990).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3750H better than Core i3-10300T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 7 3750H

Core i3-10300T
Core i3-10300T
The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 3750H
Ryzen 7 3750H
The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 7 3750H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3750H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3750H is built on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10300T scores 7,879 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3750H. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | — | Picasso (Zen+) (2019) |
| PassMark | 7,879 | 7,990+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,313 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,090 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10300T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i3-10300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i3-10300T | Ryzen 7 3750H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













