Core i3-10300T vs Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel

Core i3-10300T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3750H

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-10300T

2020

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3750H.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,879 vs 7,990).
  • Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 3750H

2019

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10300T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10300T.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 7 3750H better than Core i3-10300T?
    Yes. Ryzen 7 3750H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3750H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3750H is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 7 3750H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 3750H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $157 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-10300T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. At roughly 7,879 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-10300T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    1080p
    low182 FPS169 FPS
    medium143 FPS150 FPS
    high114 FPS120 FPS
    ultra89 FPS98 FPS
    1440p
    low149 FPS142 FPS
    medium116 FPS121 FPS
    high91 FPS95 FPS
    ultra72 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low70 FPS67 FPS
    medium58 FPS61 FPS
    high46 FPS48 FPS
    ultra36 FPS37 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    1080p
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium185 FPS179 FPS
    high168 FPS164 FPS
    ultra131 FPS131 FPS
    1440p
    low193 FPS178 FPS
    medium160 FPS153 FPS
    high145 FPS139 FPS
    ultra118 FPS116 FPS
    4K
    low151 FPS132 FPS
    medium130 FPS115 FPS
    high106 FPS92 FPS
    ultra80 FPS68 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    1080p
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS
    1440p
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS
    4K
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    1080p
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS
    1440p
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS
    4K
    low197 FPS200 FPS
    medium197 FPS200 FPS
    high197 FPS200 FPS
    ultra197 FPS200 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 7 3750H

    Intel

    Core i3-10300T

    The Core i3-10300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,879 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 3750H

    The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i3-10300T and Ryzen 7 3750H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10300T versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3750H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3750H is built on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-10300T scores 7,879 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3750H. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-10300T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.

    FeatureCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    3.9 GHz
    4 GHz+3%
    Base Clock
    3 GHz+30%
    2.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)
    Process
    14 nm
    12 nm-14%
    Architecture
    Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
    PassMark
    7,879
    7,990+1%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,313
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    4,090
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-10300T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    Socket
    LGA1200
    FP5
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2666
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10300T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i3-10300T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureCore i3-10300TRyzen 7 3750H
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 630
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d