
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,373 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 415 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 531 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 411 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U scores 22,373 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,373 | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











