
Core i9-10900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900X
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,377 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($590 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $261 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 37.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-10900X
2019Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $261 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 79.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 37.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,377 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($590 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i9-10900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 447 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 529 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 438 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 489 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900X and Ryzen 7 3700X

Core i9-10900X
Core i9-10900X
The Core i9-10900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,377 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-10900X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900X scores 22,377 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+7% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,377 | 22,430 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900X launched at $590 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($590 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $261 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900X delivers 37.9 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 57% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900X | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $590 | $329-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.9 | 68.2+80% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











