
M1 Pro 8-Core
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M1 Pro 8-Core
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core), while Ryzen 7 2700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,450).
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +24.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro 8-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M1 Pro 8-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while M1 Pro 8-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M1 Pro 8-Core
2021Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core), while Ryzen 7 2700X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +24.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,450).
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro 8-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M1 Pro 8-Core moves to none and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while M1 Pro 8-Core can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 2700X better than M1 Pro 8-Core?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 398 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 7 2700X
M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core
The M1 Pro 8-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro 8-Core packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 2700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X β a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700X (base: 2.06 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X is built on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro 8-Core scores 17,218 against the Ryzen 7 2700X's 17,450 β a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB on the M1 Pro 8-Core vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 4.35 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.06 GHz | 3.7 GHz+80% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+5500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-58% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | β | Zen+ (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 17,218 | 17,450+1% |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro 8-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-6400 on the M1 Pro 8-Core versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 2700X β the M1 Pro 8-Core supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 2700X supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 2700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 2700X) β the Ryzen 7 2700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 2700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Virtualization (M1 Pro 8-Core) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X). The M1 Pro 8-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core)), while the Ryzen 7 2700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Pro 8-Core targets Mobile, Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | M1 Pro 8-Core | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M1 Pro GPU (14-core) | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mobile | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











