
M1 Pro
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,450).
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M1 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
M1 Pro
2021Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,450).
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M1 Pro moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 2700X better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 Pro and Ryzen 7 2700X
M1 Pro
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the M1 Pro has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro versus 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X β a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700X (base: 2.064 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X is built on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro scores 17,218 against the Ryzen 7 2700X's 17,450 β a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700X. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M1 Pro vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 4.35 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.064 GHz | 3.7 GHz+79% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+5500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-58% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | β | Zen+ (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 17,218 | 17,450+1% |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M1 Pro) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











