
Core i5-13420H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13420H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,205 vs 17,450).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13420H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13420H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i5-13420H
2023Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,205 vs 17,450).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i5-13420H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13420H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13420H better than Ryzen 7 2700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 170 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13420H and Ryzen 7 2700X

Core i5-13420H
Core i5-13420H
The Core i5-13420H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 17,205 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13420H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 2700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13420H versus 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13420H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13420H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13420H scores 17,205 against the Ryzen 7 2700X's 17,450 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-13420H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X.
| Feature | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+6% | 4.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,205 | 17,450+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13420H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13420H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











