
Core i5-1240P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1240P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+21% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,314 vs 11,268).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1240P
2022Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+21% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,314 vs 11,268).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-1240P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1240P better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1240P and Ryzen 7 1800X

Core i5-1240P
Core i5-1240P
The Core i5-1240P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,224 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1240P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1240P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240P versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-1240P (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-1240P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1240P scores 16,224 against the Ryzen 7 1800X's 16,305 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,268 vs 9,314 (19% advantage for the Core i5-1240P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,102 vs 1,130, a 60.1% lead for the Core i5-1240P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,577 vs 5,700 (28.3% advantage for the Core i5-1240P). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1240P vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+112% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16384 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4096 kB+220% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,224 | 16,305 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,268+21% | 9,314 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,102+86% | 1,130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,577+33% | 5,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1240P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-1240P versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 1800X — the Core i5-1240P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 1800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Alder Lake-P (Core i5-1240P) and AM4 (Ryzen 7 1800X).
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 1800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1240P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X). The Core i5-1240P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 1800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240P targets Budget, Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240P rivals Ryzen 5 6600U; Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-1240P launched at $309 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 1800X debuted at $499. On MSRP ($309 vs $499), the Core i5-1240P is $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1240P delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1800X — making the Core i5-1240P the 46.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-1240P | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-38% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5+61% | 32.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











