
Core 5 120U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 1800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,305).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 120U
2024Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,305).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Core 5 120U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 120U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120U better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 122 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 222 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120U and Ryzen 7 1800X

Core 5 120U
Core 5 120U
The Core 5 120U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 1800X
Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 5 120U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core 5 120U versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120U (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 5 120U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120U scores 16,225 against the Ryzen 7 1800X's 16,305 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120U vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+157% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16384 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4096 kB+220% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,225 | 16,305 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,314 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Core 5 120U | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











