EPYC 7301 vs Ryzen 7 1700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7301

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7301.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while EPYC 7301 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7301

2017

Ryzen 7 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 170W, a 105W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7301.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 1700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌161.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,991).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7301, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while EPYC 7301 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 1700 better than EPYC 7301?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7301 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 1700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7301 is the better fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 1700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 1700 is at an unclear MSRP at $140 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7301 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (105.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 1700 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7301 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 1700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	183 FPS	168 FPS
medium	160 FPS	144 FPS
high	128 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	142 FPS
medium	126 FPS	119 FPS
high	96 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	64 FPS
medium	62 FPS	58 FPS
high	48 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	36 FPS

Open EPYC 7301 Open Ryzen 7 1700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	206 FPS	277 FPS
medium	187 FPS	245 FPS
high	160 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	180 FPS
1440p
low	177 FPS	244 FPS
medium	163 FPS	221 FPS
high	141 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	162 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	177 FPS
medium	103 FPS	165 FPS
high	92 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	120 FPS

Open EPYC 7301 Open Ryzen 7 1700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	375 FPS	369 FPS
medium	375 FPS	369 FPS
high	375 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	369 FPS
1440p
low	375 FPS	369 FPS
medium	375 FPS	369 FPS
high	375 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	311 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	350 FPS
medium	305 FPS	284 FPS
high	269 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	209 FPS

Open EPYC 7301 Open Ryzen 7 1700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
1080p
low	375 FPS	369 FPS
medium	375 FPS	369 FPS
high	375 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	369 FPS
1440p
low	375 FPS	369 FPS
medium	375 FPS	369 FPS
high	375 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	369 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	369 FPS
medium	375 FPS	369 FPS
high	375 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	320 FPS	311 FPS

Open EPYC 7301 Open Ryzen 7 1700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7301 and Ryzen 7 1700

EPYC 7301

The EPYC 7301 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,991 points. Launch price was $825.

Ryzen 7 1700

The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7301 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7301 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the EPYC 7301 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 1700 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7301 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7301 scores 14,991 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 7301. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7301 vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.

Feature	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.7 GHz+37%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+300%	16384 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	4096 kB+700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	14,991+1%	14,772
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,065
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7301 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 7301	Ryzen 7 1700
Socket	TR4	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7301) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.