
Core 7 150U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 150U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 7 150U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 150U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,939).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Core 7 150U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 150U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 7 150U
2024Ryzen 7 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 7 150U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 1700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 150U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,772 vs 14,939).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $140 MSRP, while Core 7 150U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 150U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 150U better than Ryzen 7 1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 311 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 150U and Ryzen 7 1700

Core 7 150U
Core 7 150U
The Core 7 150U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,939 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
The Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,772 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core 7 150U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 1700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 150U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core 7 150U versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core 7 150U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 150U scores 14,939 against the Ryzen 7 1700's 14,772 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 7 150U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 150U vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700.
| Feature | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16384 kB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4096 kB+220% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,939+1% | 14,772 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,065 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 150U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 150U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1700). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1700 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1700 rivals Core i7-7700K.
| Feature | Core 7 150U | Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












