PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-14701TE

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,519 vs 27,565).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.2 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 70.2 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-14701TE

2024

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.4 vs 70.2 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,519 vs 27,565).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.2 vs 120.4 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14701TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Core i7-14701TE?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 19.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is $163 cheaper on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $392 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 71.5% better value on MSRP (120.4 vs 70.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i7-14701TE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14701TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-14701TE Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
1080p
low	269 FPS	246 FPS
medium	251 FPS	228 FPS
high	211 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	252 FPS	217 FPS
medium	212 FPS	182 FPS
high	165 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	151 FPS
medium	145 FPS	127 FPS
high	108 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	85 FPS

Open Core i7-14701TE Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
1080p
low	364 FPS	525 FPS
medium	311 FPS	441 FPS
high	261 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	332 FPS
1440p
low	316 FPS	451 FPS
medium	280 FPS	392 FPS
high	237 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	288 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	283 FPS
medium	170 FPS	251 FPS
high	161 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	203 FPS

Open Core i7-14701TE Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
1080p
low	688 FPS	689 FPS
medium	643 FPS	689 FPS
high	562 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	474 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	688 FPS	689 FPS
medium	581 FPS	689 FPS
high	500 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	425 FPS	621 FPS
4K
low	500 FPS	539 FPS
medium	425 FPS	471 FPS
high	383 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	323 FPS	341 FPS

Open Core i7-14701TE Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
1080p
low	688 FPS	689 FPS
medium	688 FPS	689 FPS
high	688 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	687 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	688 FPS	689 FPS
medium	688 FPS	689 FPS
high	621 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	549 FPS	645 FPS
4K
low	568 FPS	675 FPS
medium	516 FPS	594 FPS
high	462 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-14701TE Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14701TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

Core i7-14701TE

The Core i7-14701TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,519 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14701TE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-14701TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14701TE versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14701TE (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14701TE scores 27,519 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645's 27,565 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701TE vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645.

Feature	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+2%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+3%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	27,519	27,565
Geekbench 6 Single	2,781	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14701TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701TE) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7645). The Core i7-14701TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14701TE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-14701TE rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000.

Feature	Core i7-14701TE	Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Embedded/Industrial	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-14701TE launched at $392 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 debuted at $229. On MSRP ($392 vs $229), the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14701TE delivers 70.2 pts/$ vs 120.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 the 52.7% better value option.