
Core i5-1335U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1335U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,073 vs 14,093).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1335U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1335U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1335U
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,073 vs 14,093).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1335U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1335U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1335U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 193 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1335U and Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U

Core i5-1335U
Core i5-1335U
The Core i5-1335U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,093 points. Launch price was $340.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,073 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1335U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1335U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1335U versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1335U (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1335U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1335U scores 14,093 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U's 14,073 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-1335U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1335U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,093 | 14,073 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,389 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,456 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1335U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1335U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U). The Core i5-1335U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1335U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-1335U rivals Ryzen 5 7535U.
| Feature | Core i5-1335U | Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











