
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,875 vs 12,073).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
2017Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,875 vs 12,073).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 1600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 284 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U


Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,875 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,073 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 scores 11,875 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U's 12,073 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 11,875 | 12,073+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












