
Ryzen 5 1600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 1600
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 1600
2017Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $219 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,073 vs 12,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U better than Ryzen 5 1600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 284 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U


Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
The Ryzen 5 1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,261 points. Launch price was $219.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,073 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1600 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1600 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1600 scores 12,261 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U's 12,073 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 1600. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 12,261+2% | 12,073 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 1600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











