
Core i7-11600H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-11600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,441).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Core i7-11600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-11600H
2021Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,441).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Core i7-11600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11600H better than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE

Core i7-11600H
Core i7-11600H
The Core i7-11600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,441 points. Launch price was $395.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-11600H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11600H versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-11600H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11600H scores 15,441 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE's 15,316 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-11600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-11600H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+125% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake H45 (2021) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 15,441 | 15,316 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,903 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11600H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11600H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE). The Core i7-11600H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11600H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11600H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i7-11600H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












