
Core i5-11400H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11400H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,262 vs 15,316).
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Core i5-11400H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11400H
2021Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,262 vs 15,316).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Core i5-11400H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE better than Core i5-11400H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11400H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE

Core i5-11400H
Core i5-11400H
The Core i5-11400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,262 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11400H and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11400H versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-11400H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400H scores 15,262 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE's 15,316 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 15,262 | 15,316 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE). The Core i5-11400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












