
Core i3-14100F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-14100F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-14100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,381).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.3 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i3-14100F
2024Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 141.1 vs 73.3 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-14100F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,316 vs 15,381).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.3 vs 141.1 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-14100F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-14100F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-14100F and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE

Core i3-14100F
Core i3-14100F
The Core i3-14100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,381 points. Launch price was $109.


Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,316 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i3-14100F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i3-14100F versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-14100F (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-14100F scores 15,381 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE's 15,316 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-14100F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-14100F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE.
| Feature | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+12% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 15,381 | 15,316 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-14100F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-14100F launched at $109 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE debuted at $209. On MSRP ($109 vs $209), the Core i3-14100F is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-14100F delivers 141.1 pts/$ vs 73.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE — making the Core i3-14100F the 63.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-14100F | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-48% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 141.1+92% | 73.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












