Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,330 vs 22,430).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +46.2% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 65.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $329 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600?
Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 46.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 68.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 46.2% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better fit. You are getting 68.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is 65.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 46.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 67.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low186 FPS200 FPS
medium159 FPS163 FPS
high131 FPS137 FPS
ultra104 FPS110 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS156 FPS
medium125 FPS121 FPS
high100 FPS100 FPS
ultra78 FPS80 FPS
4K
low67 FPS84 FPS
medium59 FPS71 FPS
high47 FPS56 FPS
ultra37 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low255 FPS561 FPS
medium221 FPS525 FPS
high197 FPS428 FPS
ultra157 FPS383 FPS
1440p
low229 FPS545 FPS
medium201 FPS471 FPS
high179 FPS394 FPS
ultra146 FPS337 FPS
4K
low180 FPS350 FPS
medium161 FPS304 FPS
high142 FPS274 FPS
ultra107 FPS242 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low333 FPS561 FPS
medium333 FPS561 FPS
high333 FPS561 FPS
ultra333 FPS561 FPS
1440p
low333 FPS561 FPS
medium333 FPS561 FPS
high333 FPS538 FPS
ultra302 FPS470 FPS
4K
low333 FPS499 FPS
medium270 FPS394 FPS
high238 FPS343 FPS
ultra189 FPS275 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
1080p
low333 FPS561 FPS
medium333 FPS561 FPS
high333 FPS561 FPS
ultra333 FPS561 FPS
1440p
low333 FPS561 FPS
medium333 FPS561 FPS
high333 FPS561 FPS
ultra333 FPS555 FPS
4K
low333 FPS561 FPS
medium333 FPS501 FPS
high333 FPS447 FPS
ultra320 FPS396 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,330 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 scores 13,330 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 50.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
32 MB+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
12 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-42%
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
13,330
22,430+68%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket
AM4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($199 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 delivers 67.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 1.8% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 PRO 2600Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$199-40%
$329
Performance per Dollar
67.0
68.2+2%
Release Date
2018
2019