
Core i7-1265U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1265U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,282 vs 13,330).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1265U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core i7-1265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-1265U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-1265U
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,282 vs 13,330).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1265U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core i7-1265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-1265U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1265U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 189 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1265U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

Core i7-1265U
Core i7-1265U
The Core i7-1265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,282 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,330 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1265U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1265U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1265U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1265U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-1265U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1265U scores 13,282 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600's 13,330 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1265U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
| Feature | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,282 | 13,330 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1265U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1265U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












