
Core 3 100U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 3 100U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,312 vs 13,330).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core 3 100U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 3 100U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 3 100U
2024Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,312 vs 13,330).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core 3 100U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 3 100U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 better than Core 3 100U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 189 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

Core 3 100U
Core 3 100U
The Core 3 100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,312 points. Launch price was $426.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,330 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 3 100U packs 6 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core 3 100U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core 3 100U (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100U scores 13,312 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600's 13,330 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core 3 100U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
| Feature | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 8 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+183% |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,312 | 13,330 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 100U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 100U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












