Core 3 100U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

Intel

Core 3 100U

6 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 100U

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,312 vs 13,330).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core 3 100U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 3 100U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 better than Core 3 100U?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.2% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 10 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 100U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
1080p
low176 FPS186 FPS
medium143 FPS159 FPS
high116 FPS131 FPS
ultra95 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low148 FPS152 FPS
medium117 FPS125 FPS
high95 FPS100 FPS
ultra79 FPS78 FPS
4K
low83 FPS67 FPS
medium71 FPS59 FPS
high57 FPS47 FPS
ultra44 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
1080p
low184 FPS255 FPS
medium153 FPS221 FPS
high139 FPS197 FPS
ultra120 FPS157 FPS
1440p
low161 FPS229 FPS
medium136 FPS201 FPS
high127 FPS179 FPS
ultra109 FPS146 FPS
4K
low130 FPS180 FPS
medium113 FPS161 FPS
high106 FPS142 FPS
ultra91 FPS107 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
1080p
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS333 FPS
high333 FPS333 FPS
ultra333 FPS333 FPS
1440p
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS333 FPS
high333 FPS333 FPS
ultra333 FPS302 FPS
4K
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS270 FPS
high333 FPS238 FPS
ultra310 FPS189 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
1080p
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS333 FPS
high333 FPS333 FPS
ultra333 FPS333 FPS
1440p
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS333 FPS
high333 FPS333 FPS
ultra333 FPS333 FPS
4K
low333 FPS333 FPS
medium333 FPS333 FPS
high333 FPS333 FPS
ultra333 FPS320 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 100U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

Intel

Core 3 100U

The Core 3 100U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,312 points. Launch price was $426.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,330 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 3 100U packs 6 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core 3 100U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Core 3 100U (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 100U scores 13,312 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600's 13,330 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core 3 100U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.

FeatureCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
Cores / Threads
6 / 8
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+21%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
3.4 GHz+183%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm-17%
12 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-U Refresh (2024)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
13,312
13,330
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 100U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 100URyzen 5 PRO 2600
Socket
FCBGA1744
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0