PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,889).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 95W, a 89W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,889).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1483.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 6W.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i7-9700K?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.2% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 38.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.2% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better fit. You are getting 38.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 18.2% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	308 FPS	259 FPS
medium	278 FPS	237 FPS
high	231 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	229 FPS
medium	221 FPS	191 FPS
high	178 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	159 FPS
medium	140 FPS	134 FPS
high	108 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	360 FPS	386 FPS
medium	321 FPS	320 FPS
high	291 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	324 FPS
medium	282 FPS	280 FPS
high	258 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	243 FPS
medium	221 FPS	214 FPS
high	208 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	169 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	360 FPS	497 FPS
medium	360 FPS	497 FPS
high	360 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	497 FPS
medium	360 FPS	497 FPS
high	360 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	430 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	484 FPS
medium	360 FPS	425 FPS
high	360 FPS	362 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	299 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	360 FPS	497 FPS
medium	360 FPS	497 FPS
high	360 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	497 FPS
medium	360 FPS	497 FPS
high	360 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	497 FPS
medium	360 FPS	497 FPS
high	360 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	377 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 32% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6 MB+2300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark	14,397	19,889+38%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Socket	LGA1151	FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.