
Core i7-1370P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1370P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $438 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 19,993).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1370P
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe 96EU, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $438 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 19,993).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1370P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1370P better than Ryzen 5 PRO 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1370P and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i7-1370P
Core i7-1370P
The Core i7-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 19,993 points. Launch price was $438.


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1370P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1370P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-1370P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-1370P (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-1370P uses the Raptor Lake-P (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1370P scores 19,993 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-1370P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1370P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+6% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-P (2023) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,993 | 19,889 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,200 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,095 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1370P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-1370P) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). The Core i7-1370P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1370P targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-1370P rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-1370P launched at $438 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($438 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $438 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-1370P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $438 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.6 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











