
Core i7-1280P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1280P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $482 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,043).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i7-1280P
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $482 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 20,043).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i7-1280P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1280P and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i7-1280P
Core i7-1280P
The Core i7-1280P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,043 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1280P packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1280P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1280P versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-1280P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1280P scores 20,043 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-1280P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-1280P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| Feature | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,043 | 19,889 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1280P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-1280P launched at $482 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($482 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $482 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-1280P | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $482 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.6 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











