
Core i7-12700TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i7-12700TE
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,744 vs 19,889).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i7-12700TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700TE and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i7-12700TE
Core i7-12700TE
The Core i7-12700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,744 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700TE packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-12700TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-12700TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-12700TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700TE scores 19,744 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700TE vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| Feature | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+129% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+56% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,744 | 19,889 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700TE launched at $378 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($378 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $378 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-12700TE | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.2 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











