Core i7-11850H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i7-11850H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-11850H

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,873 vs 19,889).
  • 483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
  • Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11850H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i7-11850H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-11850H is ahead with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-11850H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low280 FPS259 FPS
medium250 FPS237 FPS
high213 FPS199 FPS
ultra182 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low236 FPS229 FPS
medium190 FPS191 FPS
high156 FPS155 FPS
ultra137 FPS137 FPS
4K
low165 FPS159 FPS
medium134 FPS134 FPS
high104 FPS104 FPS
ultra90 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low497 FPS386 FPS
medium497 FPS320 FPS
high437 FPS284 FPS
ultra394 FPS248 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS324 FPS
medium460 FPS280 FPS
high388 FPS255 FPS
ultra333 FPS218 FPS
4K
low337 FPS243 FPS
medium288 FPS214 FPS
high264 FPS201 FPS
ultra232 FPS169 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low497 FPS497 FPS
medium497 FPS497 FPS
high497 FPS497 FPS
ultra497 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS497 FPS
medium497 FPS497 FPS
high497 FPS497 FPS
ultra487 FPS430 FPS
4K
low497 FPS484 FPS
medium480 FPS425 FPS
high427 FPS362 FPS
ultra356 FPS299 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low497 FPS497 FPS
medium497 FPS497 FPS
high497 FPS497 FPS
ultra497 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low497 FPS497 FPS
medium497 FPS497 FPS
high497 FPS497 FPS
ultra497 FPS497 FPS
4K
low497 FPS497 FPS
medium497 FPS497 FPS
high497 FPS441 FPS
ultra431 FPS377 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-11850H and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i7-11850H

The Core i7-11850H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,873 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-11850H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-11850H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11850H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-11850H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11850H scores 19,873 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11850H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

FeatureCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB+380%
Process
10 nm SuperFin
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark
19,873
19,889
Geekbench 6 Single
1,911
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11850H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
Socket
FCBGA1787
FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11850H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). The Core i7-11850H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11850H targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11850H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

FeatureCore i7-11850HRyzen 5 PRO 220
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation Laptop