PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,889).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 19,889).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 40.7% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 52.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 40.7% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better fit. You are getting 52.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 40.7% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	192 FPS	259 FPS
medium	152 FPS	237 FPS
high	123 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	229 FPS
medium	119 FPS	191 FPS
high	97 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	159 FPS
medium	70 FPS	134 FPS
high	55 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	326 FPS	386 FPS
medium	318 FPS	320 FPS
high	290 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	324 FPS
medium	292 FPS	280 FPS
high	267 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	243 FPS
medium	258 FPS	214 FPS
high	235 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	169 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	326 FPS	497 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	497 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	430 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	484 FPS
medium	326 FPS	425 FPS
high	289 FPS	362 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	299 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low	326 FPS	497 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	497 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	497 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	497 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	377 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 13% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 41.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.9 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	6 MB+2300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark	13,029	19,889+53%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Socket	LGA1200	FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.