Ryzen 5 230 vs Ryzen 5 8640U

AMD

Ryzen 5 230

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8640U

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 230

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,274).
    • Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Ryzen 5 8640U

    2023

    Why buy it

    • +0.4% higher PassMark.
    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
    • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen 5 230?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 8640U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640U is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 8640U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen 5 8640U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it gives you 0.4% higher PassMark. Ryzen 5 230 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 230 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    1080p
    low261 FPS261 FPS
    medium237 FPS237 FPS
    high199 FPS199 FPS
    ultra171 FPS171 FPS
    1440p
    low230 FPS230 FPS
    medium190 FPS190 FPS
    high155 FPS155 FPS
    ultra137 FPS137 FPS
    4K
    low159 FPS159 FPS
    medium133 FPS133 FPS
    high103 FPS103 FPS
    ultra91 FPS91 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    1080p
    low372 FPS371 FPS
    medium309 FPS309 FPS
    high272 FPS272 FPS
    ultra236 FPS236 FPS
    1440p
    low313 FPS313 FPS
    medium270 FPS270 FPS
    high244 FPS244 FPS
    ultra207 FPS207 FPS
    4K
    low234 FPS234 FPS
    medium206 FPS206 FPS
    high191 FPS191 FPS
    ultra161 FPS161 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    1080p
    low505 FPS507 FPS
    medium505 FPS507 FPS
    high505 FPS507 FPS
    ultra505 FPS507 FPS
    1440p
    low505 FPS507 FPS
    medium505 FPS507 FPS
    high505 FPS507 FPS
    ultra443 FPS443 FPS
    4K
    low493 FPS493 FPS
    medium435 FPS435 FPS
    high372 FPS372 FPS
    ultra308 FPS308 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    1080p
    low505 FPS507 FPS
    medium505 FPS507 FPS
    high505 FPS507 FPS
    ultra505 FPS507 FPS
    1440p
    low505 FPS507 FPS
    medium505 FPS507 FPS
    high505 FPS507 FPS
    ultra505 FPS507 FPS
    4K
    low505 FPS507 FPS
    medium501 FPS501 FPS
    high442 FPS442 FPS
    ultra380 FPS380 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 230 and Ryzen 5 8640U

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 230

    The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 8640U

    The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    Both the Ryzen 5 230 and Ryzen 5 8640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 230 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 230 scores 20,186 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12
    6 / 12
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz
    4.9 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz
    3.5 GHz
    L3 Cache
    16 MB (total)
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm
    4 nm
    Architecture
    Hawk Point (2024−2025)
    Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
    PassMark
    20,186
    20,274
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    10,675
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,519
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    10,308
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 3.0.

    FeatureRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    Socket
    FP8
    FP8
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5x-7500
    Max RAM Capacity
    256 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 230) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 230 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.

    FeatureRyzen 5 230Ryzen 5 8640U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon 760M
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V (SVM)
    Target Use
    Productivity