
Ryzen 5 230
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 230
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,274).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 230
2025Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,274).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen 5 230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 230 and Ryzen 5 8640U


Ryzen 5 230
Ryzen 5 230
The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 230 and Ryzen 5 8640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 230 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 230 scores 20,186 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,186 | 20,274 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 10,675 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,519 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,308 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 230) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 230 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











