
Ryzen 5 8640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8640HS
2023Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 38,955).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Ryzen 5 8640HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 496 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Ryzen 9 5900X


Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 65% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 19,851 | 38,955+96% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640HS | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











